Document from University about English Semantics. The Pdf explores various theories of meaning, including Leech's seven types and Yule's conceptual vs associative meaning. This University-level material in Languages also covers Eleanor Rosch's prototype theory, focusing on family resemblances and hierarchical categories.
See more35 Pages


Unlock the full PDF for free
Sign up to get full access to the document and start transforming it with AI.
English
Semantics
Leech's (1981) seven types of meaning
Conceptual vs associative meaning (Yule, 1985)
Associative meaning can be linked to connotative and reflected meaning.
August is the 8th month of the year -> conceptual.
By changing 8th for best we get -> August is the best month of the year -> associative (subjective), but it's
conventional because it's true for many people.
Our interpretation depends on this kind of association.
I didn't mean to disturb you -> intention
Pretty' means beautiful -> definition
Speaker meaning vs sentence/ word meaning
Dictionaries as word meaning, speaker meaning for communication in language learning
Question - Have you got the time? - > it offers two kinds of interpretation (yes/ yes, it's 9 o'clock)
Answer -Communicative exchanges: Statements, commands, questions, offers.
If we see the previous sentence as an interrogative clause, it would we a question, if were thinking about an
intention of asking for an answer, it would be a command, because we want an answer.
We're talking about speaker meaning from Hurtford, Heasley and Smith.
Words are containers of meaning.
Wife my under doesn't stand me! - > multimodal communication
It's difficult to explain what's going on in linguistic terms.
The structure of the sentence is mixed. It's not the expected order (my wife doesn't understand me)
Oddness' due to structuring -> 'oddness' due to unexpectedness (our expectations)
The meaning of words from the perspective of words as containers of meaning
Possible sentences/ combinations with CAR BOUGHT A NEW MEGAN PETE
Pete bought Megan a new car
Megan bought Pete a new car
Pete bought a new Megan car -> Polysemic
Car bought Megan a new Pete -> This one wouldn't make sense because we don't associate cars as living things,
while Pete and Megan are living things.
Words also have roles for interpreting meaning (semantic roles) -> depending on our approach to meaning we
have different lists. Yule's interpretation is different to Halliday's perspective. - > Task 1
-> From Halliday's perspective, Megan would be an actor (as it's a material process)
Collocations: We can tell a word by the company it keeps.
Homework: Answer the following questions: Read Chapter 9. Semantics and carry out the following activities:
1. Outline the main concepts and key terms of the different types of lexical relations according to Yule. Find at
least one example of each in English (different from those given by him). - > HomeworkWhen looking at semantics, we're also looking at collocations (different kinds of meaning and how it is constructed)
- For example, abandoned at birth, abandoned the traditional secure, feel abandoned.
- Collocations are not in the same section as lexical relations. WHY? Try to find examples and compare them
We try to recognize patterns in language (the program of wordsmith tools or the BBI Combinatory Dictionary of
English along with linguee or deepl), for example the words it usually appears with -> "You can tell a word by the
company it keeps". Words tend to co-occur with others at the same time -> this is the type of knowledge we don't know
when we start to learn a language.
1.2. Locating semantics within linguistics
What areas of linguistics can you recognize? (Identifying different areas of enquiry in linguistics)
Syntax: The structure of language and the combination of words from a formal approach. Impose some kind of
understanding of what's going on in kinds of structure. Different types of language we can recognize in a language.
Semantics and pragmatics
Pragmatics can be described as the study of language use; how language interacts with context. The domain of
pragmatics is generally viewed as excluding those aspects of meaning that fall into the realm of semantics.
Homework: Murphy and Koskela (pages 124 & 125): What is the relationship between semantics and pragmatics?
Semantics is concerned with the literal, context-independent meaning of words and sentences, focusing on
conventional meaning and truth-conditional meaning. Pragmatics, on the other hand, deals with context-dependent
meaning, non-conventional meaning, and the speaker's intended meaning, which includes implicatures and the use
of language in social contexts.
Is this relationship accredited by all linguistics? If not, why not?
No, it is not. The reason for this is that the various dimensions along which semantics and pragmatics may be
demarcated do not exactly overlap. For example, the literal meaning of a sentence is not purely independent of
context, as it relies on context-dependent processes such as assigning reference and resolving ambiguities./ Many
have also pointed out that the various dimensions along which semantics and prag- matics may be demarcated do
not exactly overlap. For example, the literal meaning of a sentence is not purely independent of the context, but
relies on context-dependent processes such as assigning reference, and resolving any ambiguities.Why are collocations not in the same section as lexical relations?
Collocations are not typically included in the same section as lexical relations because they involve a different type
of relationship between words. Lexical relations, such as synonymy, antonymy, hyponymy, and meronymy, are
semantic relationships that exist between individual lexemes based on their meaning. Collocations, on the other
hand, are combinations of words that frequently occur together in a language and form a conventional unit. They
are not based on a direct semantic relationship between the words themselves but rather on the habitual co-
occurrence of these words in speech or writing.
Collocations -> lexical relations (how do words relate to one another)? - > know this by hard
with reckless abandon, black coffee -> if they appear together (we're talking of co-appearance
happiness - joy: it's either one or the other -> synonym (the same conceptual meaning) -> what's the
connection between the two?
Hedging: -
When we look at the different relations (man, he, Peter) vertically, it's a paradigmatic relation. The three of them
belong to the realm of the nominal.
Looking at the structure of the sentences horizontally we have syntagmatic relations (sintagmas)
Semantics and pragmatics
SEMANTICS:
Context- independent meaning
Conventional meaning
Literal meaning
Truth- conditional meaning
Stored representations in the mind
PRAGMATICS:
Context- dependent meaning
Non- conventional meaning
Speaker meaning (what's implicated)
Non-truth. conditional meaning
On-line processing
Examples
That's twenty pounds, sir -> a comercial transaction
That's a very nice green lion, Joey -> a close relationship between an adult and Joey (a child)
-> The fact that all of us interpret this scenario as such it's that the meaning constructed in this way builds the
context.
To describe meaning in both we can't look at the structure, but at the context.