Document from University about The Noun: Gender and Number, The Expression of Possession, The Genitive Case. The Pdf, a detailed academic text for university students in Languages, explores noun inflection, gender, and the Saxon genitive, providing examples and explanations.
See more9 Pages


Unlock the full PDF for free
Sign up to get full access to the document and start transforming it with AI.
Language is the mirror of thought and culture. Have we ever paused to ponder how something as fundamental as a noun-the cornerstone of all sentences-can encapsulate so much complexity? How does it adapt to represent distinctions as subtle as gender, as logical as number, or as nuanced as possession? Today, we explore these questions through the lens of English grammar, focusing on gender and number in nouns, the expression of possession, and the genitive case.
This exploration is firmly anchored in the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFRL), which underscores the role of grammatical competence in achieving communicative proficiency. Additionally, our framework aligns with Spain's Royal Decree 1041/2017 and Decree 68/2018, which set forth the curricular foundations for Official Schools of Languages. These legal texts not only highlight the importance of morphosyntactic awareness but also advocate for a functional, communicative approach to teaching grammar.
o Yet, understanding these aspects is not without its challenges. English nouns present a particular set of difficulties for Spanish-speaking learners, as evidenced in our classrooms. One recurrent issue is the confusion between the 's possessive and the of-phrase, with learners often defaulting to constructions such as "the car of my brother" instead of "my brother's car." Additionally, the absence of gendered nouns in English can lead to hesitation or overgeneralizations, as in the incorrect assumption that all nouns referring to people must carry gender markers (e.g., actor and actress). The rules of plural formation-regular and irregular-pose their own hurdles, with errors like "childs" or "mans" frequently appearing in written and oral production.
Beyond these errors, roadblocks emerge when learners attempt to transfer concepts directly from their first language. Spanish speakers, for instance, might struggle with the absence of a distinct grammatical gender in English, which leads to uncertainty when referring to people or objects. Likewise, the seemingly arbitrary use of the apostrophe in the genitive case challenges learners to balance formal precision with practical application.
This paper invites us to reflect not only on the intricacies of these grammatical elements but also on their broader pedagogical implications. How can we, as educators, dismantle these roadblocks and guide our students toward accurate and meaningful expression? What strategies can we employ to make the abstract tangible and the complex comprehensible?As we delve into this topic, let us keep these questions in mind, grounding our reflections in the principles of communicative competence and drawing inspiration from the legal and methodological frameworks that shape our teaching.
To begin with, the grammatical category of number requires that every noun form must be understood as either singular (which denotes 'one) or plural (which denotes 'more than one), a distinction that is based on the recognition of entities which can be enumerated or counted.
There are two important considerations when dealing with the grammatical category of number in nouns: the distinctions between countable/uncountable and variable/invariable.
Regarding the first distinction, we should say that countable nouns may appear in plural form and may be modified by determiners in plural and by any numeral (those students, several teachers, three tables) whereas when they appear in the singular, they have to be accompanied by a determiner in the singular form.
Sometimes, they can also occur in the singular with the indefinite article or the numeral one (a teacher, one professor) and, to finish with, it must be emphasised that plural countable nouns are modified by the determiners many and (a) few, instead of by much or (a) little. there are many/few chairs.
By contrast, uncountable nouns have no plural form and neither do they occur with the indefinite article, with the numeral one nor with any other determiner that presupposes a notion of countability. However, they can occur without any determiner even though they are not plural: I bought butter, milk is expensive.
Differently from what happened with countable ones, uncountable nouns can be modified by the determiners much and (a) little, but not by many and (a) few. there is much/little butter left. It would be necessary to highlight that nouns are not intrinsically countable or uncountable. Rather, we might more tellingly speak of countable and uncountable uses of nouns.
On the other hand, invariable nouns do not present number contrast, that is, they are always either singular or plural. Those singular invariable (singularia tantum) have both singular form and concord. Within this group, we include proper nouns, uncountable nouns and some nouns ending in '-s'like subjects and sciences ending in -ics, some games, certain diseases as well as collective nouns which refer to groups of single entities.
By contrast, plural invariable nouns (pluralia tantum) have both a plural form and take a plural concord. Here, we find binary nouns denoting tools, instruments or articles of clothing which consist of two equal parts which are joined together. Added to those, we also have aggregate nouns which refer to entities which comprise or may be perceived as comprising an indefinite number of parts; some proper nouns and other unmarked plurals that are not morphologically marked as such.
We should also note that there are also nouns with equivocal numbers as it can be seen in This barrack is/are ... or The data is/are insufficient. Some other words alter their meaning between the singular and the plural (differentiated plural).
There is a final issue related to those situations in which variable nouns allow number contrast. In other words, when they are countable.
The regular plural in English presents two inflections: '-s' and '-es'. The latter one is the suffix used for nouns ending in -s, -ss, -sh, -ch, -x and some other nouns ending in -o: crosses, fishes, torches, taxes. Moreover, there are some nouns which pluralise in 's, namely, acronyms, numerals and letters: MP's, PhD's, CD's, in the 1980's; please, dot your i's.
It must be pointed out that nouns ending in -o are rather complex, since there is no fixed rule as to whether the suffix -s or -es should be added although there are some common cases such as the ones in which nouns ending in -o are preceded by a vowel. In those cases, they usually take the suffix -s: kangaroos, studios, videos. On the contrary, in the case of those nouns ending in -o but preceded by a consonant, they might take one or the other although is far more common the addition of the suffix -s. pianos, photos, tomatoes, potatoes, echoes, heroes. The final case is that in which both suffixes are possible: volcano, archipelago, buffalo, tornado.
Another issue that we should have into consideration is the way how we pronounce the plural suffix. It should be noted that It has three different pronunciations: iz/ after bases ending in sibilants (churches), /z/ after bases ending in a vowel or voiced consonant other than a sibilant (dogs) and /s/ after bases ending in a voiceless consonant other than a sibilant (cats).
In addition, there are two special cases: nouns ending in -y preceded by a vowel are regular: boy, boys. However, if the -y is preceded by a consonant, the -y becomes -ie and then they add the suffix -s. lady, ladies. The other special case is that of compound nouns that may take the plural inflection in the last element; in the first element when the compound includes a postmodifier,in the final particle,or, in both elements: grownups, spoonfuls (last element); passers-by, commanders-in-chief (first element); menservants, women doctors (both elements).
On the contrary, by definition an irregular plural is unpredictable, and so they have to be learnt as individual lexical units. We may classify them into irregulars due to vibration such as in those nouns ending in -s which change it into -ses /ziz/ (house, houses), those ending in -th /0/ which change it into -ths /oz/ (bath, baths / mouth, mouths) and, lastly, those ending in -f(e) /f/ which change it into -ves /vz/ (knife, knives / life, lives / shelf, shelves / wife, wives / wolf, wolves).
A further group is the one of the mutation plurals that present a change of the media vowel (tooth/teeth, foot/feet, mouse/mice, man/men, woman/women, louse/ lice) or those which add the suffix -(r)en: ox/ oxen, child/ children, brother/ brethren. Apart from them, we have some others coined as zero plural because they are not morphologically marked for plural, even if they have both a plural meaning and concord. We include under this group names of animals such as sheep, deer, cod and other zero plurals such as aircraft, dice and others ending in -s such as series, species, means.
Added to all these groups, there is a final one left, which is the one including those nouns coming from other languages that may maintain their original form, for example, we will find here Greek nouns ending in -is which form their plural in -es (hypothesis/hypotheses) or some others ending in -on which form their in plural in -a (phenomenon/ phenomena). Similarly, we will also have within this group, Latin nouns ending in -us which form their plural in -i (syllabus/ syllabi), but also in -(e)/(o)ra (corpus/ corpora); together with some others ending in -a that form the plural in -ae (alumna/ alumnae) and, last but not least, those ending in -um that form the plural in -a (datum/data) and those ending in -ex/-ix that form the plural in -ices. appendix/ appendices.
Moving on to gender inflection, it must be said that it is a misunderstood grammatical category, mainly because of the distinction between natural and grammatical gender. The former is that which refers to the extralinguistic world, the feminine referring to females and the masculine referring to males; whereas the latter is not related to natural sex.
English has no grammatical gender, but rather natural gender, that is, female people and animals are feminine while male people and animals are masculine and inanimate things are neuter.
Gender in personal nouns is expressed in two different ways being those by means of a different word or through a gender suffix.
It is important to note that in order to avoid sexual bias, several attempts have been made to introduce sex-neutral forms,such as firefighter instead of fireman, chairperson instead of chairman, mail carrier instead of postman, homemaker instead of housewife, headteacher instead of headmaster and so on. Furthermore, some nouns can be male or female in reference as required. This is known as personal dual gender because they refer to both males and females at