The principles, procedures and processes involved in dispute resolution

Document from Inhousew Limited about The principles, procedures and processes involved in dispute resolution. The Pdf details the terms of limitation for various claims and pre-action protocols, useful for University Law students. It also includes sections on settlement offers, security for costs, and appeals.

See more

28 Pages

The principles, procedures and processes involved in dispute resolution
Legend
CPR = Civil Procedure Rules
C = Claimant
D = Defendant
TP = Third party
Different options for dispute resolution:
The characteristics of arbitration, mediation and litigation which make them an appropriate
mechanism to resolve a dispute.
NB: following case of Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil CBC [2023]: court can order parties to engage in
alternative dispute resolution
Characteristics
Advantages
Disadvantages
Arbitration
Arbitrator is an expert
who conducts
proceedings of case (in
some ways similar to
litigation), however,
confidential and more
flexible "
Arbitrator produces
binding decision "
Can be provided for in
contracts
Parties can choose
arbitrator "
Arbitrators are experts in
their field, which
particularly in complex
cases can be helpful "
Confidential "
Flexibility in terms of
choosing rules,
jurisdiction "
Can be quicker than court
process "
Possible to enforce
remedy under s 66
Arbitration Act 1996
Cost (can be similar
to litigation or even
more expensive) "
Rules out option to
go to court [except
for in limited
circumstances]"
remedies are more
limited under
arbitration than
under litigation "
Slow "
Adversarial (can
damage working
relationship) "
Third parties cannot
be added after
proceedings have
begun
Mediation
Neutral person is
appointed to act as
neutral negotiator "
Confidential meetings
and undertaken without
prejudice (i.e., nothing
said will aect later
litigation)"
Binding upon both
parties signing an
agreement
Less contentious and
more collaborative form of
dispute resolution which
can help in maintaining
relationship "
Terms of agreement can
contain items that a court
could not order"
Flexible and confidential "
Quick "
Low cost "
Privacy "
Ability to withdraw at any
point
Risk that no
settlement is
reached "
Outcome not
enforceable "
May not be
appropriate where
complex issues
debated that require
expertise "
No disclosure
© Inhousew Limited
1
Resolving a dispute through a civil claim:
preliminary considerations: limitation, pre-action protocols:
Limitation
Limitation periods apply - claim for must be issued within the following times:
Pre-action protocols
Practice Direction - Pre-Action Conduct and Proposals (“PDPAC”)
Basics
Para. 2: PDPAC applies to all claims where there is no other specific pre-action protocol
Para. 3: before commencing proceedings, court will expect parties to have exchanged
sufficient information to
(a) understand each other’s position
(b) make decisions about how to process
(c) try to settle issues without proceedings
(d) consider form of ADR
(e) support efficient management
(f) reduce costs
Para. 6: where there is a relevant pre-action protocol, parties should comply with that
protocol before commencing proceedings
Failure to comply
Failure to comply with pre-action protocols may lead to sanctions imposed by court e.g.,
Suspend proceedings until steps which should have been taken are taken
Parties are relieved of obliging protocols!
Ordering party at fault to pay costs!
Ordering party at fault to pay costs on an indemnity basis!
Depriving claimant of interest on damages
etc.
Exceptions
No need to comply with PDPAC if
(a) Telling other party before would defeat purpose e.g., where seeking freezing order
and claimant does not wish to warn the defendant
(b) Urgency of application makes it impracticable; e.g., limitation period approaching
(c) claimant follows a statutory or other formal pre-action procedure
Procedure
Litigation
One party sues the other
in the court system "
Court proceedings are
carried out in
accordance with law and
civil procedure rules "
Decision is binding on
parties
Court has wide powers/
remedies available "
Suitable for complex
issues "
Third parties can be
added later on in
proceedings "
Possible to appeal in
certain circumstances
Cost "
Length - can take a
while to conclude "
Not confidential "
Not flexible "
No choice of judge
Type of Claim
Breach of contract
Breach of contract
where contract was
made under deed
Personal injury
Tort claims
© Inhousew Limited
2

Unlock the full PDF for free

Sign up to get full access to the document and start transforming it with AI.

Preview

The principles, procedures and processes involved in dispute resolution

Legend

CPR = Civil Procedure Rules C = Claimant D = Defendant TP = Third party

Different options for dispute resolution

  • The characteristics of arbitration, mediation and litigation which make them an appropriate mechanism to resolve a dispute.
  • NB: following case of Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil CBC [2023]: court can order parties to engage in alternative dispute resolution

Characteristics, Advantages, Disadvantages

Arbitration

  • Arbitrator is an expert who conducts proceedings of case (in some ways similar to litigation), however, confidential and more flexible
  • Parties can choose arbitrator
  • Cost (can be similar to litigation or even more expensive)
  • Arbitrators are experts in their field, which particularly in complex cases can be helpful
  • Confidential
  • Rules out option to go to court [except for in limited circumstances]
  • Arbitrator produces binding decision
  • Can be provided for in contracts
  • Flexibility in terms of choosing rules, jurisdiction
  • remedies are more limited under arbitration than under litigation
  • Slow
  • Possible to enforce remedy under s 66 Arbitration Act 1996
  • Adversarial (can damage working relationship)
  • Third parties cannot be added after proceedings have begun

Mediation

  • Neutral person is appointed to act as neutral negotiator
  • Less contentious and more collaborative form of dispute resolution which can help in maintaining relationship
  • Risk that no settlement is reached
  • Confidential meetings and undertaken without prejudice (i.e., nothing said will affect later litigation)
  • Terms of agreement can contain items that a court could not order
  • Flexible and confidential
  • Quick
  • Low cost
  • No disclosure
  • Privacy
  • Ability to withdraw at any point
  • Outcome not enforceable
  • May not be appropriate where complex issues debated that require expertise
  • Binding upon both parties signing an agreement

@ Inhousew Limited 1

  • Can be quicker than court process

Litigation

  • One party sues the other in the court system
  • Court proceedings are carried out in accordance with law and civil procedure rules
  • Decision is binding on parties
  • Third parties can be added later on in proceedings
  • Possible to appeal in certain circumstances
  • Cost
  • Length - can take a while to conclude
  • Not confidential
  • Not flexible
  • No choice of judge

Resolving a dispute through a civil claim: preliminary considerations

Limitation

Limitation periods apply - claim for must be issued within the following times:

Type of ClaimLimitation PeriodUnderlying Legislation
Breach of contract6 years from when cause of action accruedS 5 Limitation Act 1980
Breach of contract where contract was made under deed12 years from when cause of action accruedS 8 Limitation Act 1980
Personal injury3 years from when cause accrued or date of knowledgeS 11 Limitation Act 1980
Tort claims6 years from when loss/damage suffered (where damage not discovered, within 3 years of claimant's date of knowledge with a 15-year maximum limit)S 2 Limitation Act 1980

Pre-action protocols

Practice Direction - Pre-Action Conduct and Proposals ("PDPAC")

Basics
  • Para. 2: PDPAC applies to all claims where there is no other specific pre-action protocol
  • Para. 3: before commencing proceedings, court will expect parties to have exchanged sufficient information to
  • (a) understand each other's position
  • (b) make decisions about how to process
  • (c) try to settle issues without proceedings
  • (d) consider form of ADR
  • (e) support efficient management
  • (f) reduce costs
  • Para. 6: where there is a relevant pre-action protocol, parties should comply with that protocol before commencing proceedings
Failure to comply

Failure to comply with pre-action protocols may lead to sanctions imposed by court e.g.,

  • Suspend proceedings until steps which should have been taken are taken
  • Parties are relieved of obliging protocols
  • Ordering party at fault to pay costs
  • Ordering party at fault to pay costs on an indemnity basis
  • Depriving claimant of interest on damages
  • etc.
Exceptions

No need to comply with PDPAC if

  • (a) Telling other party before would defeat purpose e.g., where seeking freezing order and claimant does not wish to warn the defendant
  • (b) Urgency of application makes it impracticable; e.g., limitation period approaching
  • (c) claimant follows a statutory or other formal pre-action procedure
Procedure

@ Inhousew Limited 2

  • Court has wide powers/ remedies available
  • Suitable for complex issues
  • (1) Letter before claim. PDPAC sets out that claimant should issue a letter before claim including:
  • (a) Basis on which claim is made
  • (b) Clear summary of the facts
  • (c) What remedy the claimant is seeking and if it is financial loss, how the amount sought has been calculated
  • (2) Defendant must respond within reasonable time - between 14 days - 3 months (in complex cases)

Pre-Action Applications

Pre-Action Disclosure Applications

  • Sometimes necessary to investigate a potential claim
  • Governed by CPR 31.16
  • Order will specify documents or classes of documents and deadline for disclosure

Applications for Pre-Action Inspection of Property

  • CPR 25.5 but can occur pre-action in protocol phase
  • Inspection application must be supported by evidence to show that property is or may become subject matter of proceedings

Parties and Causes of Action

Parties

  • Claimant = party alleging claim and seeking remedy
  • Defendant = party addressed in claim, alleged to be the wrongdoer

Causes of action

  • Tort = act or omission that gives rise to injury or harm to another and amounts to a civil wrong for which courts impose liability
  • Breach of contract = where a violation of any agreed terms and conditions of a binding contract brings about a certain consequence (e.g., remedies)

Calculating limitation periods for claims in contract and tort

  • See above

Practice Direction - Pre-action conduct

  • See above

Principles and purpose of pre-action protocols governing particular claims and consequences for failure to follow their terms

Pre-action protocol for debt claims

  • Applies to
  • Business including sole traders and public bodies that bring claims against debtors who are individuals or sole traders
  • Does not apply to business to business debts (except where the debtor is a sole trader)

Requirements

Claim must include

  • Information on debt owed, including statement of account with details of interest and charges
  • Information on how payment can be made
  • Recipient has 30 days to respond

Pre-action protocol for professional negligence

  • Applies
  • To claims made against professionals due to negligence

Requirements

Claim must include

  • Summary of facts
  • Financial value of claim
  • Recipient should inform insurer and acknowledge notice within 21 days of receipt

Personal injury protocol

Applies to

  • Primarily personal injury claims which are likely to be allocated to fast track

Not intended to apply to claims which proceed under

  • a) RTA Protocol
  • b) EL/PL Protocol
  • c) Pre-Action Protocol for the Resolution of Clinical Disputes and
  • d) Pre-Action Protocol for Disease and Illness Claims

Procedure - steps recommended PI protocol

@ Inhousew Limited 3

  • (1) Early contact
  • C should contact D as soon as possible
  • If takes time to prepare letter of claim, should send letter of notification
  • (2) Letter before claim containing certain information must be sent
  • (3) promotion of early settlement - C must wait 21 days before issuing proceedings where
  • a) D has admitted liability;
  • b) there has been full disclosure of medical reports on which parties rely;
  • c) C has sent D schedules of loss and damage
  • (4) D or insurer should respond within 21 days
  • (5) procedure on disclosing evidence; duty on D to preserve disclosure documents
  • (6) experts - protocol sets out procedure for joint selection of experts

Road Traffic Accident (RTA) Protocol

applies to low value personal injury claims in road traffic accidents

  • Low value straightforward road traffic claims go through RTA portal
  • Claims meeting criteria follow a 3-stage process
  • Special part 8 hearing process where liability admitted but damages not agreed
  • Complex cases or those where liability is not admitted will comes out of portal for litigation

Employer's liability and public liability claims procedure

apply to claims arising from accidents/diseases arising out of a breach of a statutory duty or common law duty of care

Applicable law: mechanisms to determine which country's laws apply to a contractual or tortious claim issued in the courts of England and Wales

Contracts

  • Can be agreed by the parties by virtue of a governing law clause
  • If none agreed, then Rome I+ Regulation (as retained in the UK) provides specific rules depending on the type of contract
  • where these rules are inconclusive, the law will generally be the law of the habitual residence of the characteristic performer (usually the supplier of the goods or service)

Torts

  • In respect of non-contractual obligations the Rome II Regulation will apply in most cases
  • Under the Rome II Regulation the general rule is to apply the law of the place where the damage occurs or is likely to occur
  • Special rules determine the applicable law for certain types of non-contractual obligation, including product liability, unfair competition, environmental torts and torts relating to intellectual property rights
  • Private International Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1995 will only apply to issues relating to tort that do not fall under the Regulation
  • Defamation is governed by the common law

Where to start proceedings

Allocation of business between the High Court and the County Court

Overview

Money claims of £100,000 or less (excluding personal injuries)Personal injury claims of less than £50,000Must commence in County Court
Money claims of £100,000 or moreMay commence in High Court
Personal injury claims of more than £50,000
Where a statute prescribes courtMust be issued in that court e.g. Consumer Credit Act 1974 requires all claims to be issued in the County Court

-

Can’t find what you’re looking for?

Explore more topics in the Algor library or create your own materials with AI.