Document from Pogil about Statistical Tests of Data: The t Test. The Pdf, designed for university students in Chemistry, explains how to interpret t-values and make decisions about significance, including learning objectives and prior knowledge. It presents formulas and tables for data analysis, with examples and questions for comprehension.
See more23 Pages
Unlock the full PDF for free
Sign up to get full access to the document and start transforming it with AI.
Students should be able to:
Carl Salter Statistical Tests of Data: The t Test POGIL WWW.POGIL.ORGScientists often compare sets of similar measurements. For example, an analytical chemist might compare two different methods for measuring the amount of carbon dioxide in air. Or a food chemist might measure dissolved carbon dioxide in two different brands of soda. Even when the comparison isn't explicit, analysts are often implicitly comparing their measurements against reference samples or accepted standards. Whatever the case, experimental scientists often must decide whether an observed difference is important and worthy of communication. Usually they will focus on the two most important statistics about a data set: its average X (or mean) and its standard deviation s. Together these are called the summary statistics of the set. Here are their formulas.
x =- 2×, i=1
S = ( i=1 E(X- x)2 n-1 1/2
Two sets of data can differ in their average values, or they can differ in their standard deviations. The scientists might judge either of these differences to be noteworthy.
Statisticians call this significance testing, and they have developed tests to judge the significance of a difference between summary statistics. What do they mean by a "significant difference"? A difference that is not the result of random error. Unfortunately it is not possible to determine with certainty whether a particular difference is caused by random error; however, statisticians have been able to develop a procedure that can compute this probability (based on certain assumptions). If we know the probability that the difference could be caused by random error, then we also know the probability that it is not caused by random error, so we will know the probability of a "significance difference." That is the best that the statistical test can do.
At this point, experimental scientists have to make a decision: how much leftover "random" probability are they willing to live with? With a brand-new result, it is unlikely that their initial measurements are decisive; the scientists will be betting that their limited set of data has really uncovered something "significant." Their professional reputations-perhaps even their jobs-could be at stake, so they will want to know the probability associated with their bet! In chemistry and physics, an experimental difference is usually labeled "significant" when the probability that it is not due to random error is greater than 95%. In other fields the threshold probability may be higher or lower than 95%. The threshold is never determined by statisticians; it is determined collectively by the experimentalists who work in a particular field.
There are two tests designed to test differences among summary statistics: the t test tests the difference of two averages, and the Ftest tests the difference of two standard deviations. This activity will examine the t test. Because there are three different variations of the t test, this activity is rather long, and so it has been divided into two parts. Part 1 develops an understanding of how the t test does its job, and Part 2 examines the three different types of t tests and how they can be performed in Excel. Another activity covers the Ftest.
Consider this ... You put 19 white balls and 1 red ball, all the same size, into a large, black bag. You can't see the balls in the bag, but you can reach into the bag and hold them.
Consider this ... April and Betty each measure the absorbance of the same colored solution three times; each student has her own absorption spectrometer. (Absorbance is unitless.)
April Betty 0.121 0.123 0.122 0.124 0.123 0.125 x 0.122 0.124 s 0.001 0.001
Consider possible claims regarding April and Betty's data:
a. Betty's absorption data are higher than April's; therefore Betty's spectrometer must somehow be different from April's, making it give higher measurements than April's.
b. April's absorption data are lower than Betty's; therefore April must have somehow diluted her sample slightly before she made her measurements.
c. Betty and April's absorption data are a little different, but not by much, so maybe the difference is entirely random.
d. There's no real difference between April's and Betty's data; the difference is within the limit of performance of the two spectrometers.
Consider the following possible sets of data that April and Betty might obtain. Set 1 is listed again for easy comparison. Determine the means and standard deviations by inspection. Divide the work up among your group.
April Betty 0.121 0.123 0.122 0.124 0.123 0.125 x 0.122 0.124 S 0.001 0.001
April Betty 0.120 0.124 0.121 0.125 0.122 0.122 0.122 0.126 0.123 0.123 x 0.121 0.125 x 0.122 0.122 S 0.001 0.001 S 0.001 0.001
April Betty 0.120 0.122 0.122 0.124 0.122 0.124 0.122 0.124 0.124 0.126 0.122 0.124 x 0.122 0.124 x 0.122 0.124 S 0.002 0.002 S 0 0
April Betty 0.121 0.123 0.121 0.123 0.122 0.124 0.122 0.124 0.123 0.125 0.123 0.125 x 0.122 0.124 S 0.001 0.001
April Betty 0.122 0.124 x S undefined undefined
April Betty 0.121 0.121Changing the difference in the means